http://gnurbs.blogsome.com amerei's my blessed holy rants Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:40:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2009/10/22/bangungot-but-not-quite/#comment-412 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:51:33 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2009/10/22/bangungot-but-not-quite/#comment-412 thanks man. will do from now on. thanks man. will do from now on.

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2009/10/22/bangungot-but-not-quite/#comment-411 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:31:17 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2009/10/22/bangungot-but-not-quite/#comment-411 always pray before you sleep always pray before you sleep

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2009/10/10/beginning-simple-circuits-analysis-with-kirchoffs-laws/#comment-410 Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:43:10 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2009/10/10/beginning-simple-circuits-analysis-with-kirchoffs-laws/#comment-410 yo bro. thanks! posting something about electronics has always been one of my plans ... but i actually lacked the skill set so i've been yearning for the time to actually just get some hands on. this is my new hobby. yo bro. thanks! posting something about electronics has always been one of my plans … but i actually lacked the skill set so i’ve been yearning for the time to actually just get some hands on. this is my new hobby.

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2009/10/10/beginning-simple-circuits-analysis-with-kirchoffs-laws/#comment-409 Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:12:18 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2009/10/10/beginning-simple-circuits-analysis-with-kirchoffs-laws/#comment-409 Ha, its no wonder the job was for Com Eng students lol. Good job learning through it haha. Ha, its no wonder the job was for Com Eng students lol. Good job learning through it haha.

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/laptop-love/#comment-408 Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:02:36 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/laptop-love/#comment-408 hehehe....lol this is funny. u spend time like hell Im sure ! hehehe….lol this is funny. u spend time like hell Im sure !

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/zealotry/#comment-406 Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:21:08 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2006/04/09/zealotry/#comment-406 В нашем магазине предоставлена мебель различных направлений и производителей. Это гостинные и прихожие, офисная мебель и кабинеты руководителей, различная молодежная и детская мебель. В нашем магазине предоставлена мебель различных направлений и производителей. Это гостинные и прихожие, офисная мебель и кабинеты руководителей, различная молодежная и детская мебель.

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/laptop-love/#comment-405 Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:08:31 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/laptop-love/#comment-405 Great. thanks Great. thanks

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2008/05/18/one-lone-marine/#comment-404 Thu, 28 May 2009 22:34:33 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2008/05/18/one-lone-marine/#comment-404 Wow. I'm inspired(see my name). Great poem! Wow. I’m inspired(see my name). Great poem!

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/dynamic-memory-allocation-in-linux-assembly/#comment-403 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:12:25 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/dynamic-memory-allocation-in-linux-assembly/#comment-403 yep. you're right. =) but then im just showing behavioral concepts, not implementations above the raw function. yep. you’re right. =) but then im just showing behavioral concepts, not implementations above the raw function.

]]> http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/dynamic-memory-allocation-in-linux-assembly/#comment-402 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:00:44 +0100 http://gnurbs.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/dynamic-memory-allocation-in-linux-assembly/#comment-402 You wondered what to do if you wanted to deallocate something in the middle of the data segment, since you can't just brk back past it. I read somewhere a long time ago, and have no references to back it up, that the C library never actually shrinks the data segment. If you free() something, that memory is just marked as free for future allocations. The rationale was that if that program used x amount of memory at one point, it would probably use it again, so why bother brking back only to have to brk forward again later? Also, that means fewer calls to the kernel, so a faster program. You wondered what to do if you wanted to deallocate something in the middle of the data segment, since you can’t just brk back past it. I read somewhere a long time ago, and have no references to back it up, that the C library never actually shrinks the data segment. If you free() something, that memory is just marked as free for future allocations. The rationale was that if that program used x amount of memory at one point, it would probably use it again, so why bother brking back only to have to brk forward again later? Also, that means fewer calls to the kernel, so a faster program.

]]>